On Dec 24, 2007 4:53 AM, Morten Kromberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, I don't see how 3: can be "more flexible than DFNS".
> I can use execute to turn a string into a DFN, which surely
> gives me the same functionality as 3: ?

I am not familiar enough with the syntactic capabilities of Dyalog's
execute to say for sure.

But, 3 : can be used in place, with modifiers or any other part
of J's execution capability.

Also, I tend to think of 3 : not as an entity to itself but as
an instance of the : operator.  So things that hold for 3 :
also hold for 0 :, for 1 :, for 2 :, for 4 : and maybe for 13 :
(I do tend to think of u : as something not so related,
because u : does not treat strings, nor boxed strings,
nor 0 in the same fashion as the other : forms treat
them.)

Anyways, can you use ({thorn}DFN)/1 2 3 in Dyalog,
as a simple example?  (Practical examples in
J are more likely to use the rank conjunction, but I do
not want to push this into territory I know is currently
irrelevant.)

-- 
Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to