Hi Raul & Tracy,

    Thank you for reading and commenting on my material. I do read your
comments and they do help steer my course. Thank you for listening. 

    Obviously, as my knowledge increases, my position changes. I have
found, as Ric suggested, that by now the two character primitives don't
bother me nearly as much. I accept the benefits of tacit J. I
am slowly becoming like other J users. I am inside the box with you.

    However, as I have gained knowledge, I have lost the view 
from outside the box - what is seen by a new J user. Two things 
originally put me off:

1)     The two character primitives.
2)     Being told that when I wished to create a verb from the expression:
        %<:#y , for example, I needed a conjunction to join each verb:
        Function =: %@:<:@:# . 

    There is probably nothing unique about my perceptions - the 
only difference I have from others is that when I meet something
that I think needs changing, I feel passionately about the need to 
try to see it changed.

    Had I seen an alternative system that was easily available or 
had I not been interested in seeing what Ken Iverson's later years 
had produced, I would have been gone quickly, without ever 
knowing the quality of J.

    There is a huge market for a system that is easy to use, flexible
and powerful. Someone else will supply such a system if 
Jsoftware does not do it. And it is not quality that survives; 
it's wide use.

    I was really pleased to see this statement from Raul:

"In my opinion we do have a problem with ascii -- it's rather
ugly and does not give us very many distinct characters
to work with.  When unicode gets sufficiently adopted that
everyone can use some subset of utf-8 without having to
worry about bom or mime types or editors or keyboards
mappings or font installation, then this problem will go
away, and J can be modified to use those characters.  Right
now, however, the only universally viable subset of utf-8 is
ascii."

    It makes a lot of sense and obviously Raul has a lot more
credibility than I do. 

    I will have another attempt at my second issue in a 
subsequent email. I need to clean up my position after
reading your comments in the hope that I can find 
something that the two of you will support.

    Thanks,

        Don

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to