Except maybe for the confusion with the existing "S" language. On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Don Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Raul, > > You are right. I am beginning to feel that I am getting somewhere. It > would be much better to return to one of my previous suggestions and use a > second mode in which the language is called S to avoid confusion. ... -- Devon McCormick, CFA ^me^ at acm. org is my preferred e-mail ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
