I just wanted to blow off steam, I knew about :[: and didn't really have a question for
Programming. In former times I could count on u&n to be monadic-only, behavior I have to unlearn.
Roger Hui wrote:
This is an example of arguments that Ken called "too powerful"
as it can be directed at any function or facility that you don't like.
To get what you want, use u&n :[: instead of u&n .
p.s. Why is this in "Chat" and not "Programming"?
----- Original Message -----
From: Kip Murray <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:33
Subject: [Jchat] Dyadic u&n and m&v
To: Chat forum <[email protected]>
Rant: In my experience x u&n y and x m&v y are a nuisance,
producing unexpected results when I
want a domain error! /Kip Murray
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
