Very nice! Regarding the warning at the top, that BNF is "not the most concise, nor precise, way of specifying J's syntax". Verbosity is no worry to me, but is the implication that a BNF spec of J is incomplete or inaccurate in some important ways? If so, knowing those would be very helpful.
Thanks for putting this together, Sean Stickle On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 16:37, Don Guinn <[email protected]> wrote: > The URL is messed up. Should be > http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Backus–Naur%20Form< > http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Backus%E2%80%93Naur%20Form> > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I have put up a draft copy of a BNF representation of J's syntax on the > > jwki. > > > > http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Backus–Naur%20Form > > > > If anyone has time, could you look it over, for silly obvious type > errors? > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
