I don't see how the amount of information in the button images relate to their size.
Another question is that choice of pictograms. For, example, Run, Step Into, Step Over and Step Out are intuitive. Run to Cursor and Cut Back are not intuitive. The former can be replaced with an arrow pointing at a caret. The latter would probably work as long as I learn or recall what cut back is. Etc. So it's not the size, its the appropriate choice of symbols and familiarity. ----- Original Message ---- > From: Nicholas Spies <[email protected]> > > Unless there is a compelling reason not to do so, I think the debug > icons should be made about twice as large so as to make them easily > readable. > As they call for rather more complex actions than, say, choosing bold or > italic for text, it is all the more important to make them instantly > recognizable. > Ideally, as with text size defaults, there should be a size range. > Lacking that, larger would be better than simply tiny. > Thanks! > --Nick > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
