There are many ways to express the exponent form
of complex quantities in J

   http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Essays/Complex%20Operations

   x:r.1p1
_1

   q1=.   ^...@o. j. 0.5 * i.3 4
   q2=. _12 o. o. 0.5 * i.3 4
   q3=.     r. o. 0.5 * i.3 4
   q4=.     r.  1r2p1 * i.3 4
   
   q1-:"2/q2,q3,:q4
1 1 1





> From: Roger Hui <[email protected]>
> 
> The most beautiful identity in all of mathematics is:
> 
>    _1 = e^0j1*pi  
> 
> ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_identity )
> which in one short equation relates the fundamental
> quantities _1, e, 0j1, and pi.  It has always bothered
> me that in J the answer is unavoidably:
> 
>    ^ 0j1 * 1p1
> _1j1.22461e_16
> 
> Unavoidable if the computations are done using
> finite precision floating point numbers, which
> IEEE 64-bit floats are.  (pi can not be represented
> exactly as a finite precision floating point number.)
> 
> However, in J there is the possibility of doing something
> special for ^...@o., the exponential function (o.) composed
> with pi times (o.), and in J7.01 that possibility has been
> realized.  With special code, ^...@o. "knows" when the
> argument of ^ falls exactly on the real or imaginary
> axis and has magnitude the requisite fraction/multiple
> of pi, and accordingly provide the exact answer.  Thus:
> 
>    0 j. 0.5 * i.3 4
>   0 0j0.5 0j1 0j1.5
> 0j2 0j2.5 0j3 0j3.5
> 0j4 0j4.5 0j5 0j5.5
>    ^...@o. 0 j. 0.5 * i.3 4
> 1 0j1 _1 0j_1
> 1 0j1 _1 0j_1
> 1 0j1 _1 0j_1
> 
>    ^...@o. 0 j. 2e9 + 0.5 * i.3 4
> 1 0j1 _1 0j_1
> 1 0j1 _1 0j_1
> 1 0j1 _1 0j_1
> 
> In contrast:
> 
>    ] t=: o. 0 j. 0.5 * i.3 4
>         0  0j1.5708 0j3.14159 0j4.71239
> 0j6.28319 0j7.85398 0j9.42478 0j10.9956
> 0j12.5664 0j14.1372  0j15.708 0j17.2788
>    ^ t
>              1 6.12303e_17j1 _1j1.22461e_16 _1.83691e_16j_1
> 1j_2.44921e_16 3.06152e_16j1 _1j3.67382e_16 _4.28612e_16j_1
> 1j_4.89843e_16 5.51073e_16j1 _1j6.12303e_16 _2.44989e_15j_1
> 
> The difference here is that t is represented by
> IEEE 64-bit floats, and the quantities are 
> necessarily inexact.
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: DIETER ENSSLEN 
> Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 15:40
> Subject: Re: [Jchat] J and CAS, and problems in CAS
> To: Chat forum 
> 
> > Dear Roger
> > 
> > if this relates to J and CAS topic, could you please add an 
> > enlightening word in English or mathematics to it
> > 
> > thanks
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm



      
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to