This is not true - there is positional precedence _only_ - instead of the traditional complicated layers of "operator" precedence on top of positional, then defaulting to positional for "operators" in the same layer.
It's important to properly frame this feature of J - it eliminates arbitrary levels of complexity associated with precedence by reducing them to the base case of positional (although we rank position from right to left). On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Skip Cave <[email protected]> wrote: > ...and "there is no precedence for > primitives" > ... > -- Devon McCormick, CFA ^me^ at acm. org is my preferred e-mail ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
