Thanks Ric,

The speed is definitely an issue in order to cover the key concepts in 15-20 
seconds. Longer and you have tutorials that may not be referenced as readily, 
shorter and it quickly becomes overload. 

I had a chance to watch a live Cirque de Soleil performance in December and 
realized that there is a form of performance in which you cannot possibly keep 
track of all that is going on, and yet it is still possible to enjoy it. The 
advantage of these animations is that you can view them repeatedly, with  text 
accompaniment on the reference page to provide the learner some tools to 
structure the experience. 

Your favourite is now on the jwiki page for Plus (+) as 'Plus 2X2 3d'. It is a 
bit of a hybrid between 'Plus 3X3' and 'Plus 2X2'

All may review the animations here: 
http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Vocabulary/plus

Cheers, bob

On -Mar5-2010, at -Mar5-20103:43 PM, Sherlock, Ric wrote:

> I like the way array addition is shown in plus 3x3, but I think that there 
> are perhaps too many numbers so that it looks a bit busy and hard to grasp at 
> that speed.
> 
> But my favourite is plus2.key (not linked on the wiki page)
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBlNIAKDveU&feature=channel
> 
>> From: bob therriault
>> 
>> Hey everybody,
>> 
>> I've posted three versions of the Plus (+) animation on the Jwiki here:
>> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Vocabulary/plus
>> These incorporate previous suggestions of including J code, colliding
>> 3d matrix planes (with explosions!) and 2d rearrangements. I have my
>> preference, but I would love to have feedback from a wider sample.
>> 
>> Cheers, bob
>> 
>> On -Feb23-2010, at -Feb23-20105:22 PM, 0j1 wrote:
>> 
>>> You could show the J code using variables such as x and y, and
>> display the
>>> values of x and y graphically without showing how they were created.
>>> 
>>> bob therriault wrote:
>>>> Hi Skip,
>>>> The challenge I faced with showing the J code for these reference
>> videos was
>>>> how to create a matrix without introducing either the Shape ($) or
>> Integer
>>>> (i.) verbs into the explanation (which increases both the duration
>> and the
>>>> cognitive loading). For the tutorial approach, I think the 'coding
>> window' is
>>>> essential, but not so much for the reference. Any ideas on how I can
>> get the
>>>> 'code' back into the reference video efficiently would be welcome.
>>>> Cheers, bob
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -
>>> For information about J forums see
>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to