I find it frustrating to have the numbers covered by the green +.  I believe
you are doing this movement to indicate that the operation is actually
happening... which is good, but I get seriously irritated because it
obstructs what I'm looking at.  Maybe you can think of another way - or
maybe make the Green + transparent so I can still see the numbers or
something.  I can't really think of a solution, but I did feel a strong
negative reaction to the covering up of the numbers.

Perhaps when you guys look at something, you know what it is, so you see it
right away.  It takes a few beats for me to figure out what's going on, so I
would be happier if everything was just a tad slower.

If you watch TV and count during the shot changes, the shortest shot is
roughly 3 seconds.  You can use this time frame as a rough guide, because
we're trained (by TV) to taking in a shot in 3 seconds.  (Use this info
however you like)

What's the deal with the _ character?  Is this how J works these days? I'm
not really up on the J vocabulary, so I didn't understand conjugate before
this... so it took me a couple of runs to figure out that it's *minus *you
mean. My first few rounds, I was scratching my head trying to figure out
what the heck you need an underscore in your number for.

The graphs, by the way, are excellent.  What I mean by this is that it is
the graphs that taught me conjugate.

C

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:37 AM, bob therriault <[email protected]>wrote:

> And of course if there is a first version of conjugate, a second soon
> appears. Viewable at http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Vocabulary/plus
>
> Cheers, bob
>
> On -Mar10-2010, at -Mar10-20104:48 PM, bob therriault wrote:
>
> > Moving on a bit.
> >
> > Conjugate was the obvious choice for a monadic verb. The monadic verbs
> introduce some new challenges, not to mention the length of negative
> imaginary numbers and the different combination that can occur.
> > You can watch the results at:
> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Vocabulary/plus   As usual, I await
> comments.
> >
> > Cheers, bob
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>



-- 
Catherine Lathwell
http://www.aprogramminglanguage.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to