just because microsoft does it for another operator does not mean that it is the correct intuitive way to do it.
Anyhow, I don't see the point of this discussion. In my opinion it is implemented in a nice, easy to understand clean way, and I don't see the reason to invest more man power to change to another syntax just for the heck of it. If real reasons appear, such as limitation in expression or bugs then we can consider a change. On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Fabian Groffen <[email protected]>wrote: > On 22-09-2011 16:46:06 +0200, Lefteris wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Fabian Groffen <[1] > [email protected]> wrote: > >> How about introducing the following "SQL-ish" syntax instead: > > > >> SAMPLE 1 PERCENT > > > >> (that is, no more doubles, but just optional PERCENT keyword) > > > > I think is too much of syntactical hassle for the user. Naturally it > comes > > that he will write > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189463.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Checkin-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/checkin-list > >
_______________________________________________ Checkin-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/checkin-list
