from where do you conclude that users like noise? no they dont... On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Martin Kersten <[email protected]>wrote:
> The syntax sugar can be added easily to the parser and discarded easily > from the expression tree. > Fabian is right, SQL users 'like' this 'noise'. > > > On 9/22/11 4:50 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > >> On 22-09-2011 16:46:06 +0200, Lefteris wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Fabian Groffen<[1]Fabian.Groffen@cwi.** >>> nl <[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>>> How about introducing the following "SQL-ish" syntax instead: >>>> >>> >>> SAMPLE 1 PERCENT >>>> >>> >>> (that is, no more doubles, but just optional PERCENT keyword) >>>> >>> >>> I think is too much of syntactical hassle for the user. Naturally it >>> comes >>> that he will write >>> >> >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-**us/library/ms189463.aspx<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189463.aspx> >> >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Checkin-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.monetdb.org/**mailman/listinfo/checkin-list<http://mail.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/checkin-list> >> > > ______________________________**_________________ > Checkin-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.monetdb.org/**mailman/listinfo/checkin-list<http://mail.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/checkin-list> >
_______________________________________________ Checkin-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/checkin-list
