Hi, I'm ok for a 0.2.0.
Florent On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Gabriele Columbro <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey guys, > I think it's about time to start the release procedure if we're still > targeting to have this out by the end of the year. > > I volunteer to perform the release and I might be able to give it a shot > tomorrow or over the weekend. > > Anything blocking this that you're aware of? If not, and case you have > still code to be checked in, I'd ask you do it by tomorrow morning. > > WDYT? Everyone agrees that 0.2.0 is the proper meaningful version for this > release? > > HTH, > Gab > > On Dec 8, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Jens Hübel wrote: > >> Perhaps a good opportunity to ask the community again for a suitable >> release date. >> >> From my side nothing should prevent us to push a release soon. We have >> several gaps in the documentation that we need to fix but this should not be >> a show stopper. How about the client library? >> >> Any suggestions? Is end of this year still valid? >> >> @Debbie: Great to hear that you made progress. Be aware that there were >> some recent changes with exception handling and that there is currently no >> full-text support in our grammar. Currently we lack updating the >> documentation.... this still is work in progress. >> >> Jens >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Debbie Deuth [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Mittwoch, 8. Dezember 2010 00:07 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: openCMIS 0.2.0-incubating release and query support >> >> It appears that there are a number of changes in OpenCMIS 0.2.0 for query >> support. We are currently implementing a CMIS repository. We have >> developed >> RepositoryService, ObjectService, RelationshipService and >> NavigationService >> code that makes use of the OpenCMIS 0.1.0 release code. I am currently >> working on implementing a DiscoveryService query. I was attempting to use >> a >> query condition processor extended from AbstractQueryConditionProcessor. >> I >> ran into several problems and limitations with this when trying to work >> with >> a more complex WHERE clause containing ANDs, ORs and parentheses (e.g., >> "WHERE (a=1 and b=2) OR (c=4 or d=5)"). It looks like the 0.2.0 code will >> alleviate many of my problems. >> >> >> >> Is there any update on when 0.2.0 will be released? Will it be before the >> end of the year? >> >> >> >> >> >> Debbie Deuth, Prospero Media Services >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> > > -- > > Eng. Gabriele Columbro > Alfresco Software, Ltd. > > > Blog: http://www.mindthegab.com > Twitter: http://twitter.com/mindthegabz > > > > > -- Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
