Sounds good to me... Jens
-----Original Message----- From: Gabriele Columbro [mailto:colum...@gmail.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2010 12:18 To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: 0.2.0 release (was: Re: openCMIS 0.2.0-incubating release and query support) Hey guys, I think it's about time to start the release procedure if we're still targeting to have this out by the end of the year. I volunteer to perform the release and I might be able to give it a shot tomorrow or over the weekend. Anything blocking this that you're aware of? If not, and case you have still code to be checked in, I'd ask you do it by tomorrow morning. WDYT? Everyone agrees that 0.2.0 is the proper meaningful version for this release? HTH, Gab On Dec 8, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Jens Hübel wrote: > Perhaps a good opportunity to ask the community again for a suitable > release date. > > From my side nothing should prevent us to push a release soon. We > have several gaps in the documentation that we need to fix but this > should not be a show stopper. How about the client library? > > Any suggestions? Is end of this year still valid? > > @Debbie: Great to hear that you made progress. Be aware that there > were some recent changes with exception handling and that there is > currently no full-text support in our grammar. Currently we lack > updating the documentation.... this still is work in progress. > > Jens > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Debbie Deuth [mailto:debbiede...@comcast.net] > Sent: Mittwoch, 8. Dezember 2010 00:07 > To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: openCMIS 0.2.0-incubating release and query support > > It appears that there are a number of changes in OpenCMIS 0.2.0 for > query > support. We are currently implementing a CMIS repository. We have > developed > RepositoryService, ObjectService, RelationshipService and > NavigationService > code that makes use of the OpenCMIS 0.1.0 release code. I am currently > working on implementing a DiscoveryService query. I was attempting > to use a > query condition processor extended from > AbstractQueryConditionProcessor. I > ran into several problems and limitations with this when trying to > work with > a more complex WHERE clause containing ANDs, ORs and parentheses > (e.g., > "WHERE (a=1 and b=2) OR (c=4 or d=5)"). It looks like the 0.2.0 code > will > alleviate many of my problems. > > > > Is there any update on when 0.2.0 will be released? Will it be > before the > end of the year? > > > > > > Debbie Deuth, Prospero Media Services > > debbiede...@comcast.net > > > -- Eng. Gabriele Columbro Alfresco Software, Ltd. Blog: http://www.mindthegab.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/mindthegabz
