[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > --- Antonio Ognio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm lucky enough to be happily chatting and even hanging out in >> person with Alvaro here in Mexico for the Debconf6 so I just told >> him I would send this mail to the list to remind us of something I >> commented and he though that could be important: Benchmarks for >> Cherokee are quite outdated.
+1, I completely agree with what Antonio wrote. :-) > Very very good idea! But pls include lighttpd in the benchmark, > too. Ok let's make a list: > > ( - Abyss) > - Apache 1/2 > ( - Boa) > - Cherokee > ( - Jigsaw) > - lighttpd > - nginx > - thttpd > - TUX > ( - Zeus - why not, eval download is available! Let's see the truth!:) ) Could you please check the license? I guess we won't be allowed to do so.. > What do u think? I think it doesn't worth testing so many servers. In my opinion it will be enough testing: Apache 1 and 2, Boa, Cherokee, Lighttpd and thttpd. At the end of the day, those are the server that people use. -- Greetings, alo. _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://www.0x50.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
