Stelianos G. Sfakianakis wrote: >> What about LiteSpeed? While the free standard version is also very >> slowed down, it should at least be fast handling PHP and other >> dynamic stuff. >> >> What about hssTVS or Tux? Only static content, but very fast with >> that...
It'd be kind of unfair, but why not? :) We can accept to be slightly slower than Tux simply because Cherokee is a user-land server (much more secure), and it implements way much more features. > If you want some hard competition, how about Zeus? :-) It wouldn't be legal to include Zeus in the benchmark. As the bast majority of that class of closed source products, they don't allow you to publish comparisons (it is on the license you gotta accept). Zeus is a very good server, so it'd be nice to be allowed to do so. Anyway, we can do it indoors to be sure that Cherokee continue winning the competition, even it we cannot say it openly. By the way, Cherokee 0.6 is gonna catch Zeus in many of its handy goodies. :-) -- Greetings, alo. _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://www.0x50.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
