Alexander Lazic wrote: > > As "A.D.F." wrote i agree with him/her?!
Without any doubt: "him" (the vi man). > What i also would prefer is to have a full descrition of the test > environment and setup ;-) Yes, this is the core of the matter and of course everyone realizes that these kind of tests are somewhat time consuming. > Some issues which should be discussed from my point of view: > > 1.) is this list the right one to discuss this issue, i think we > shouldn't missued open && free resources, what mean the list-owner > about this issue? Well, there are not many other lists about Cherokee. > 2.) There are many java/perl/php/ruby/$HELL_LANGUAGE applications out > there, whould it be possible to make a general recommendation which > setting are the *best* for fcgi/scgi/http-proxy for $SERVER and > $APPL, yes i know this is a *big* target but why not try to reach > the stars ;-)) > > 3.) What are some typical use-cases for > $APPLICATION(-Sever/Framwork/...)? > > 4.) What is the impact when you write access-logs or not and thru which > mechanism, if the $SERVER supported more then one mechanism. Yes, access-logs impact the performances but not as much as you can think of (specially if log files and served files are located on different disk devices); if the log handler is well optimized you have at most a decrease of 5% - 15%. > 5.) Who *optimize* the underlaying OS after the first-run with many > steps? I think that the only parameters that should be tweaked are the disk and network ones; anyway you know that the best values depend on HW capabilities, on OS and kernel version, etc. > 6.) Which OS would be tested, because cherokee, lighttpd and nginx > support more then one OS with there preferd eventmodel? Linux, FreeBSD, Mac OS-X, Sun Solaris (9, 10) and other Unixes; Windows 2003 or Vista might be targets only in a far future. > 7.) Which tools are available on all OSes to measure CPU/Memory usage > and/or how comparable are this tools? free(1), top(1) and similar tools. > Thoughts, opinions?! Yes, in the case of Cherokee don't expect too much from benchmarks right now, I guess it will need at least another 8-12 (24 if I had to be fair) months of development to gain optimal performances. -- Nick Name: A.D.F. E-Mail: <adefacc () tin ! it> -- _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://www.0x50.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
