Alexander Lazic wrote: >> I've done some server benchmarks - Pylons+server using Cherokee and >> Lighttpd with SCGI, nginx FastCGI and reverse proxy and cherokee >> won. The results aren't online yet as I wait for the domain to >> redirect to my new site :) > > ;-) > > But isn't it a little bit unfair to rund FastCGI against SCGI?!
I don't think so. Why? In my opinion SCGI is just a good taste implementation of FastCGI. Obviously FastCGI includes some features that SCGI doesn't, although any of those are not needed by 99% of the people, so it's not an issue actually. > How about to test the following scenario: > > cherokee, nginx, lighty => fcgi > cherokee, nginx, lighty => reverse proxy > cherokee, lighty => scgi > > What do you think?! All kind of benchmarks are welcome. :-) The thing is that, right now, the 0.6 base code is not optimized, so any benchmark performed within the next few weeks (couple of months) would be outdated as soon as we start optimizing it (even if it wins like in this case). -- Greetings, alo. http://www.alobbs.com _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://www.0x50.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
