On Sam 23.09.2006 09:06, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote:
Alexander Lazic wrote:
But isn't it a little bit unfair to rund FastCGI against SCGI?!
I don't think so. Why?
In my opinion SCGI is just a good taste implementation of FastCGI.
Obviously FastCGI includes some features that SCGI doesn't, although
any of those are not needed by 99% of the people, so it's not an
issue actually.
Ok, I haven't know this.
How about to test the following scenario:
cherokee, nginx, lighty => fcgi
cherokee, nginx, lighty => reverse proxy
cherokee, lighty => scgi
What do you think?!
All kind of benchmarks are welcome. :-)
;-)
Regards
Alex
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee@0x50.org
http://www.0x50.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
