On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote: > That solution has the disadvantage of not being able to use two or > more nodes at the same time, hasn't it?
That depends... there is a cisco thingie when you have two machines 2x power and 1x performance. But there is also a thing that virtually pools requests by flows... If UCARP really 'pools' requests for this virtual ip, 'allows a couple of hosts', then thats cute. If it only eats power of 'a couple of hosts' then it imho sucks performance wise. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
