Hi,

On 7/12/05, Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Imagine you could store your configuration (or parts of it) in a SQL
> database.

IMHO, this shouldn't be a web server feature. It'll be better if
Cherokee would have an AuthModule support. (A new TODO feature
request?) In this way, contributors can easily implement their own
authentication modules. For instance:

  libcherokee-mod-auth-pgsql
  libcherokee-mod-auth-mysql
  libcherokee-mod-auth-ldap
  libcherokee-mod-auth-pam
  libcherokee-mod-auth-kerberos

You can quite expand this list. But as I indicated above, these should
be a module, not a built-in functionality.

Regards.
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.alobbs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee

Reply via email to