Hi, On 7/13/05, Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Volkan YAZICI wrote: > > IMHO, this shouldn't be a web server feature. It'll be better if > > Cherokee would have an AuthModule support. > > Well, that is a different feature. I mean, as far as I understand > the proposal has been to store the server configuration in a SQL > database. Rob, Am I wrong?
Yep, you're right. I got it wrong. Please apply this on previous thread: :%s/auth/conf/g > > (A new TODO feature request?) In this way, contributors can easily > > implement their own authentication modules. > > This is currently supported but undocumented. There is a > "validators" mechanism which let us implement that kind of plug-ins. > :-) I'm going to try to include that documentation in the next release. That's a really good news. :) Regards. _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://www.alobbs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
