Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> leonel dijo [Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:48:09AM -0700]:
>   
>> I'll close that bug then  in ubuntu
>>
>> Thank you
>>     
>
> Just keep in mind that Ubuntu has a different version of Cherokee than
> yours, and it probably has a different maintainer. This bug, yes,
> would pose no problems - But I strongly suggest that, instead of
> taking over Ubuntu bugs, you collaborate with their official package
> maintainership (instead of hosting an unofficial repository in their
> infrastructure), to avoid misunderstandings and erroneously closed
> bugs.
>
> Greetings,
>
>   

I'm not taking over nothing.

Ubuntu UNIVERSE packages  has no owner but the MOTU  team.  So anyone
with a patch for any package for Universe can make it's contributions
and any sponsor  from the MOTU  team can review  and authorize the patch.

In a few words this is how ubuntu universe works..
Here more explicit :

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Sponsorship/SponsorsQueue

And cherokee is in universe

Ubuntu is a stable release, like Debian,  so .. the current packages 
won't change  but for security updates and that will be done with
patches for those security bugs  and this is not a security bug, and
does not apply for a  SRU. That's why I proposed to close.

When I asked for the   cherokee-admin  package  was  for the next debian
version and then the next ubuntu package that will be merged to Ubuntu
9.04  from Debian Unstable.

So I'm not putting  any  new package anywhere, as Gunnar  and Alvaro
pointed, this bug will be closed  as Won't fix.

So again  I'm not taking over nothing, But working with ubuntu MOTU as
I've been doing for some time now.



Saludos ..


Leonel

_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee

Reply via email to