On 17-dic-08, at 13:40, Miguel Angel wrote: > 2008/12/17 Tim Post <[email protected]> > I define 'crap' as a page that just regurgitates some RSS feed while > plastering it with ads. Now we get into adult sites, what about those? > Making the link say [ADULTS ONLY] seems good to me and demonstrates > why > human review is needed. > > I agree that human revision would be totally needed in the case of > real links. > And that's a problem, because the project needs a lot of workforce > in many > other parts that probably are more important that links.
We need to protect it against spam. That's all. I don't think we should even try to judge domains content. Actually, I don't mind whether it's a blog, an ads server, porn, or anything else, as long as it runs Cherokee. IMO, we ought to do something as plain as simple as: If your domain uses Cherokee you are very welcome to add it to our fancy "Proud Cherokee Users" list. Depending of the content, we'll get a relevance value that will be used to sort the domain list: The most interesting domains will much more visible at the the top, the 'crap' will end up at the bottom. At the end of the day, it's buzz. We aren't building a list of anything worth reviewing by a human, don't you think? -- Octality http://www.octality.com/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
