Well, i want to modify the source code eventually. The idea we have for our website, which, for obvious reasons can't discuss, requires us to install a small website on the clients machine, which then brings up a small website, with pre-established web pages. Once the site is running, a simple query is then sent to the main server.
we want to disable any "customize" interface, to hinder "power users" from modifying anything. Including the "dos screen" that comes up every time the server is started. On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Leonardo Santagada <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Dec 19, 2008, at 6:38 PM, Stefan de Konink wrote: > >> Leonardo Santagada wrote: >>> Someone cross compiling it should just make a script to create an >>> instaler for it (using NSIS or something else) then it would be >>> just a matter of running it and putting the installer on the >>> site... easier for everyone :) >> >> That is his problem, he doesn't want to use the binaries I have >> created, I wants to do it himself. But seems to lack the will to >> invest the time I needed to invest in it to get it even remotely to >> an acceptable cross compiling point. (While I'm pretty experienced >> in it...) > > > So now I ask, if there is a binary for windows why would someone want > to compile it from source? What is the problem with the provided > binaries? > > -- > Leonardo Santagada > santagada at gmail.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cherokee mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee > -- --------------- "After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill - the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill - you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes." I took the red pill, you? _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
