Oli Warner wrote: > It wouldn't be analysing 99% of the time... Far from it.
I agree with you; > I'd imagine something like this to be firmly nested in the admin > interface. I don't hear anybody shouting that the admin interface is an > unnecessary or undesirable luxury. For me the admin interface is only on when I needed, and actually apart from the actual configuration file has nothing to do with the running webserver. > All the processing should be done on demand (ie, when you load the > analytics' page), so the additional overhead when you're not using it is > only the same as if you turn on logging for a site. I think things are 'hit' this rule, are trivially simple to implement. But I guess the actual 'if (logging) then' part is what we should worry about. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
