Come on Ray. Don't forget about Cherokee is open source software... There is no guarantee to upgrade and get it working like a charm. Try to be nice. This is not Cherokee's or Alvaro's fault. This is just something that may happen. Please accept my apologies in advance if I'm taking your opinion in a wrong way.
Pablo On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 3:39 PM, ray horn <[email protected]> wrote: > > Failure to go after an upgrade is worse than broken config, IMHO. > On the other hand, a broken config can be fixed by comparing the original > config with the config after the upgrade but in my case Cherokee 0.99.23 is > simply non-functional - end of story. > > *Ray C. Horn* > > > > > > > > > <http://bit.ly/dUltB>*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:* This email is CONFIDENTIAL > and intended only for those to whom this email has been sent by the original > sender. You may purchase the rights to redistribute this email > by clicking here <http://blog.vyperlogix.com/index.php/donations/>. > > > > ------------------------------ > From: [email protected] > Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:28:09 -0700 > Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Cannot start Cherokee 0.99.23 > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Leonel Nunez <[email protected]>wrote: > > And this is what the PPA and Debian Unstable is meant for. see what we can > fix before it enters on the next stable release. That's why I always ask > to backup your cherokee.conf before upgrading so we can go back to the > version we got working. > > and this is something we must fix in the cherokee package by > > 1 editing the cherokee.conf > or > 2 display a message with this change. > > > With Arch packages, we can add a post-upgrade hook to display messages > about things that changed that the user should be aware of. Is there > something similar for apt? > > I think that automatically editing the user's config file is a Bad Idea, > because, honestly, that their own file to deal with. Give them a message of > important changes (or even just a "make sure to read the changelog, > available at [url]") is much better, because it prevents problems such as > these without taking away control. Forgive me if I misunderstand, but the > recent versions of cherokee are only packaged for Sid (unstable), right? > It's my thought that anyone who uses Sid should be prepared to invest time > to fix things when upgrading software. I know that I never update my Arch > machines if I don't have time to fix any issues that may crop up as a > result, and I've accepted that as the price for having the bleeding-edge. > > -- > James Pearson > -- > The best way to predict the future is to invent it. > - Alan Kay > > _______________________________________________ > Cherokee mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee > >
_______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
