-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Alvaro Lopez Ortega schreef: > On 31-ago-09, at 18:47, pub crawler wrote: > >> Together we can help determine what Cherokee becomes (cache related) >> and what development will be done. > > > My original idea is to write a in-memory cache. Basically a fixed size > cache to hold the N most requested files. It'd be a mechanism to > reduce the load of the back-ends. > > There's another cache type we could implement though. It'd be more > like a "let's mirror everything locally" cache. In this case, every > cacheable item would be stored in a local file, and successive > requests would use read it. It looks like the implementation > complexity of this cache would be higher. > > IMO, the in-memory cache will be useful for more people, but I'd like > to know what you guys think about it.
What about mmaping your in memory cache? Then it is persistent over time? Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREKAAYFAkqcQDMACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn1/RgCdGDjBbeBKl6sYceV6RBOhrljB JVsAoIIA7Tfl8qBEg7XvTJ+d43cEc67c =snFU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
