-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Alvaro Lopez Ortega schreef: > I don't think it'd be worth.. Let's see: > > PROS: > - Persistent over reboots > > CONS: > - Higher complexity
Not really true ofcourse, because what you would do is mallocing opposed to a memory mapped region. > - Lower performance Also not really true, because the writes to disk will be handled by the os, there is no lower performance in anonymous memory in typical use if the memory itself is available. > Am I missing some other pro? :-m Might be one, but you have to evaluate this at each setup: is it worthwile to cache (store and fetch from disks) opposed to regenerating the result. Which might be not io bound. Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREKAAYFAkqcRaUACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn1sugCfTEfnmyfQPh1df/rJzHdanp8I hPQAn0oVqb76Kjbr+rtVRwNDllkJICaH =A8c1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
