El lun, 28-09-2009 a las 17:46 +0700, Alvaro Lopez Ortega escribió:
> 2009/9/28 José Illescas Pérez <[email protected]>
> 
>         we have cherokee config, statistics and graphs and log
>         archives shared
>         with nfs resource and work fine.
>         
>         we have no problems for now.
> 
> It's specially interesting to notice that Jose speaks about a
> deployment in the web farm of the ''Castilla la Mancha" government,
> one of the biggest counties of Spain.
> 
> (Jose, please correct me if I'm wrong.)

Hello,

We are currently testing, For now, we have tested with three Cherokee
virtual machines and 5 vservers.

We will put into production around 700 vservers websites with Cherokee,
within 2 months, with about 6-8 Xen virtual machines.

We want all virtual machines have all the 700 vservers configured to
perform a balancing vservers through a hardware balancer f5 type.

We're a little worried about the performance of the final solution. We
expect no problems. Alvaro, can we be reassured?, :-).

For example, about how to manage the cherokee-conf interface of many
vservers. I suggested that one could browse buttons to page back and
forward 10 by 10 vservers.

Greetings.

-- 
     _  ____ ____ __  __
    | |/ ___/ ___|  \/  | Jose Illescas Perez. Linux User #73559
 _  | | |  | |   | |\/| | TFNO: +34 925 266 219 FAX: +34 925 266 300
| |_| | |__| |___| |  | | El Webteam de http://www.jccm.es
 \___/ \____\____|_|  |_| Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha

_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee

Reply via email to