What is the reason you use Xen instead of native hardware? For balancing it is only adding overhead.
Stefan Op 28 sep 2009 om 13:15 heeft José Illescas Pérez <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven:\ > El lun, 28-09-2009 a las 17:46 +0700, Alvaro Lopez Ortega escribió: >> 2009/9/28 José Illescas Pérez <[email protected]> >> >> we have cherokee config, statistics and graphs and log >> archives shared >> with nfs resource and work fine. >> >> we have no problems for now. >> >> It's specially interesting to notice that Jose speaks about a >> deployment in the web farm of the ''Castilla la Mancha" government, >> one of the biggest counties of Spain. >> >> (Jose, please correct me if I'm wrong.) > > Hello, > > We are currently testing, For now, we have tested with three Cherokee > virtual machines and 5 vservers. > > We will put into production around 700 vservers websites with > Cherokee, > within 2 months, with about 6-8 Xen virtual machines. > > We want all virtual machines have all the 700 vservers configured to > perform a balancing vservers through a hardware balancer f5 type. > > We're a little worried about the performance of the final solution. We > expect no problems. Alvaro, can we be reassured?, :-). > > For example, about how to manage the cherokee-conf interface of many > vservers. I suggested that one could browse buttons to page back and > forward 10 by 10 vservers. > > Greetings. > > -- > _ ____ ____ __ __ > | |/ ___/ ___| \/ | Jose Illescas Perez. Linux User #73559 > _ | | | | | | |\/| | TFNO: +34 925 266 219 FAX: +34 925 266 300 > | |_| | |__| |___| | | | El Webteam de http://www.jccm.es > \___/ \____\____|_| |_| Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha > > _______________________________________________ > Cherokee mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee > _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
