> That is exactly the point; the keep it simple stupid would be NFS > ofcourse. Trying to implement something redundant always requires an > investment. I mean: what if it breaks... > > For example; I currently prefer ZFS for virtually anything storage > related, the out of the box install works, but if it breaks... who is > going to help? Better set it up yourself play with it... and then deploy > after a good test. >
Oh I plan on learning the intimate details of whatever I deploy. Just don't want to do that upfront per se right now. Many of these sorts of packages can eat up months of time with no working results. Lots of packages aren't as simple and user intuitive as Cherokee :) We can wish though. _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
