On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, pub crawler wrote: > > That is exactly the point; the keep it simple stupid would be NFS > > ofcourse. Trying to implement something redundant always requires an > > investment. I mean: what if it breaks... > > > > For example; I currently prefer ZFS for virtually anything storage > > related, the out of the box install works, but if it breaks... who is > > going to help? Better set it up yourself play with it... and then deploy > > after a good test. > > > > Oh I plan on learning the intimate details of whatever I deploy. Just > don't want to do that upfront per se right now. Many of these sorts > of packages can eat up months of time with no working results. Lots > of packages aren't as simple and user intuitive as Cherokee :) We can > wish though.
Indeed; a Cherokee style click-press-run distributed hosting could be great. A good design is a start. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
