Agreed. We'll have to work on that front. On 21/04/10 15:31, Jędrzej Nowak wrote: > for python2.4 > class Something() == class Something > > I agree with Juan... droping support for 2.4.x isn't good idea ( > debian 4 ) sill ships python 2.4... > > Bad idea... > > Pozdrawiam > Jędrzej Nowak > > > > 2010/4/21 Juan J.<[email protected]>: > >> El mié, 21-04-2010 a las 14:46 +0200, Taher Shihadeh escribió: >> >>> [...] >>> I'm not sure if that is the only thing in the code that conflicts with >>> 2.4, which by the way is pretty old now. That's why I recommended an >>> upgrade, mostly ;) >>> >>> I'm only testing with 2.6, but if that's the only issue I don't see >>> any reason not to change the code :) >>> >> Well, it depends: Do you want to drop RHEL/CentOS support? >> >> AFAIK RHEL 5.4 (and I guess 5.5 too because the API freeze, >> compatibility, support, etc) uses python 2.4.3. >> >> > From my experience, RHEL users won't upgrade because they're paying RHEL >> for the support (and python 2.4.3 is the supported version!). >> >> You can install from sources with another bin-suffix, but it could be >> great to support REHL out of the box (if possible). >> >> Regards, >> >> Juanjo >> >> -- >> jjm's home: http://www.usebox.net/jjm/ >> blackshell: http://blackshell.usebox.net/ >> ramble on: http://rambleon.usebox.net/ >> >> >>
-- [email protected] http://unixwars.com/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
