Hi everybody, I'm new to the list but I've been using Cherokee a lot lately in FreeBSD (to serve python applications mostly) and I've found that there are certain issues running Cherokee inside a FreeBSD Jail.
This is not anything you are not aware of, as you can read in this thread: http://lists.octality.com/pipermail/cherokee/2010-July/013214.html But I would like to help with this problem so: 1- sysctl security.jail.sysvipc_allowed=1 is not an option, because you miss the point of using a Jail at all (you have to set that sysctl for every Jail you have, not only the one where you run cherokee, and I've servers with more than 6 Jails on them). 2- Rocky Borg says (http://lists.octality.com/pipermail/cherokee/2010-July/013226.html) that: "Cherokee runs from inside a jail without System V IPC I'm just hoping Alvaro can shed some light on the performance implications to Cherokee." How? I meant, Rocky, did you recompile cherokee from sources? did you use some not-documented knob in the port? 3- Perhaps we could add an option when installing the port, something like "Jail friendly" or "inside a Jail" that set the needed stuff to avoid using System V IPC when installing the port within a Jail. It would be nice to know how that could impact cherokee, not only in performance but in reliabilty/etc. I could do some benchmarks to see if there is an impact in performance and could be nice if any core developer could explain us if there could be any other problems related to disabling that stuff. Thnx for taking your time reading this, I hope we will find a solution for that soon. Best regards. -- "Perceive that which cannot be seen with the eye." - Miyamoto Musashi --------------------------------------------------------------------- Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio <[email protected]> http://www.codigo23.net / http://www.e-shell.org _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
