On 30/07/2010, at 10:41, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote: > 3- Perhaps we could add an option when installing the port, something > like "Jail friendly" or "inside a Jail" that set the needed stuff to > avoid using System V IPC when installing the port within a Jail.
There is a RFE for re-implementing all this SysV shared memory stuff with mmap(): http://bugs.cherokee-project.com/537 Would that ease the pain? I'm not really sure how that's handled by FreeBSD jails. > It would be nice to know how that could impact cherokee, not only in > performance but in reliabilty/etc. I could do some benchmarks to see if > there is an impact in performance and could be nice if any core > developer could explain us if there could be any other problems related > to disabling that stuff. Performance is not an issue in this case. That little piece of shared memory is used to share some information between Cherokee and Cherokee-worker. The read/write operations are unlikely, to the point that a common server may not perform any for tens of minutes, so I wouldn't worry much about it. -- Octality http://www.octality.com/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
