Hi Juanjo

Thanks very much for your feedback. Just so you know, I've also submitted my
proposals to the development mailing list - but so far I haven't had a
single response! I was hoping to get a couple of keen developers on board
who would help drive this project forward. If C were my first language, I
would do it myself, but it's not.

For any developers listening: I can provide full documentation, including a
high level overview, configuration instructions, testing instructions, and
even actual unit tests if required.

Regards

Marcus


> On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 09:54 +0100, Marcus Don wrote:
>> [...]
>> 
>> If you are interested in the possibility of Cherokee becoming a serious
>> alternative to Apache for commercial, mass hosting, please let me know.
>> 
> 
> I can give you my opinion, but in no way I'm speaking on behalf of
> Cherokee project or the Cherokee community.
> 
> I think it can be a good idea to provide a plugin for Cherokee so it can
> support mod_rewrite alike rules (I guess it's more like a htaccess
> interface that supports Apache compatible rules, including rewrite).
> 
> As you said, anybody that it's interested can enable the plugin, and the
> details of the implementation in terms of performance won't be relevant
> for the users that don't use it. That's OK.
> 
> The point it's that 'code dump' usually doesn't work:
> 
>  - You need to submit something that actually works and it's kind of
> documented.
>  - You have to find a maintainer (yourself, or somebody else) for that
> plugin, so it doesn't rot in the source tree after a couple of releases.
> 
> After that, there will be a review and, if everything's OK, I'm sure it
> will be included into Cherokee official code (meaning that Cherokee
> project will support it, I guess Álvaro can confirm that).
> 
> I've contributed myself a plugin, and it's stuck in Cherokee's bugtrack,
> probably because it's not as interesting as the feature you're offering,
> or just because I failed in some of the mentioned points :)
> 
> Anyway, I think that if it's a valuable feature for you, you should do
> it, and I'm sure you'll find help from other developers of the team and,
> eventually, it can be included into Cherokee.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Juanjo
> 
> PS: I could help, but it's not a feature I need currently, so my
> motivation may be not enough strong. 


_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee

Reply via email to