I think this is a question that needs to be definitively answered. Has GM in fact retained the rights to the aftermarket parts in question all these years, but simply chosen not to pursue any sort of licensing practices until now? It seems to me (and me not being a lawyer) that had any patents and copyrights expired they wouldn't be able to do this.
Brad > Saying that GM deserves a cut, from a car they R&D'd 30 years ago is insane. GM > recouped their cost the moment that car was sold. Like I said before, if they > want to hold patents on parts, I don't have a problem with that. But patents > have a cut off time, once the innovation becomes common place, it belongs to ----------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
