L-88:
Introduced in 1967 (so I'm guessing they weren't in 1965).
quoted from Year One - "The L-88 engine was basically a race engine built
only in sufficient quantities to satisfy the homologation rules of various
racing sanctioning bodies. These engines featured either cast-iron or
aluminum heads (aluminum heads were optional) and a healthy 12.5:1
compression ratio. Specifications for the mechanical camshaft were .562"
intake, .584" exhaust lift; 354� intake and 360� exhaust duration. The
bottom end was of course all forged with 4-bolt main bearing caps. Although
no horsepower figures for the L-88 were released by Chevrolet in 1967, they
arbitrarily tagged the virtually identical 1968 version at 430. True figures
were probably in the 500 range."
L-89:   (also not in 1965)
1968-1969  396/375 HP, same as L-78 but with optional closed chamber square
port aluminum heads for Nova and Camaro.
1968 427/425 HP Corvette, same as L-71 but with optional closed chamber
square port aluminum heads.

PS.
I didn't really know about L-88's and L-89's but when aaw1255 said that
there were L-88's and L-89's, I just wanted to tell you that I knew that
there were L-88's and L-89's, but in reality, they were introduced farther
down the road from 1965.  I apologize, but still, here you go, I got some
information on the L-88 and L-89's...

Chad


----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] Rarest Cars in the US...


> Please educate me then.  What is a 1965 Chevelle L-88 or L-89?
> I hope you WERE paying attention Chad so you can teach me something and
make us all proud with all this knowledge from the List.  Remember 1965.
Not 1966-72 options.
>
> In a message dated Mon, 29 Jul 2002 11:16:47 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >
> >
> > haha, i just got from aaw1255 that there are L-88's AND L-89's.  Turns
out
> > that I was the one PAYING ATTENTION...  :)
> >
> >
Chad
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 11:54 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] Rarest Cars in the US...
> >
> >
> > > What is an L-89 or 88 65 Chevelle?  Do you mean an L-79 327/350.  If
you
> > do then you haven't been paying attention to the list or the books.  If
> > there is, then I haven't been paying attention.  Anyone else?
> > >
> > > Phil G.  65 SS
> > > MCC #36   ACES #555   TC #1766
> > >
> > > In a message dated Mon, 29 Jul 2002 10:23:30 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >
> > > > I was wondering what are a couple of the rarest cars you can get?
The
> > only ones I can think of right now are:
> > > >
> > > > 1965 Chevy Chevelle Z-16
> > > > 1970 Buick Gran Sport Stage 1
> > > > 1970 Chevy Chevelle LS-5 (rarer than LS - 6)
> > > > 1964 AC Cobra 427
> > > > 1969 Yenko Camaro, Chevelle, and Nova
> > > > 1963 Corvette Split Window
> > > > 1965 Chevelle L-89 (or 88)
> > > > 1969 (or 70) Daytona Charger
> > > > 1970 Plymouth Superbird
> > > > 1968 - 1970 Hemi Cuda, Roadrunner, & Charger
> > > > 1966 GTO Tri-Power
> > > > 1967 - 1970 Shelby Mustang GT350 / GT500
> > > >
> > > > Any I missed?  I know It's hard to name all cause sometimes it can
just
> > even be very rare cause of car color!
> > > >
> > > >     Chad
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
> > > To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
> > To start a new topic, send mail to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
> To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

-----------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to