60 mile test at 17.5 mpg = 3.43 gallons of gas added?  Kind of a small
sample?
If the pump at either station shut off easier or harder than the other one,
on a small sample it can make a big difference.

For example, if the pump at the second station shut off 1/2 gallon before
the pump did when you filled, you would actually have used 3.93 gallons, and
got 15.3 mpg.  I guess that would still be pretty good. My motor is similar
to yours and I get 11 or 12.

Try one where you use almost a whole tank some time.  The larger the fill up
the more accurate the test will be.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Whooohooo! 17.5 mpg!

Right Clint, although I'm mostly just pretty excited that I can
actually drive the car and not break the bank every time.  I built the
car expecting 10-12mpg tops, and am elated with the 17.5mpg!

Here's the specs as others requested:

69 Chevelle (tubbed),  ~3800 lbs
http://www.prostreetcar.com/69_malibu.html
468 ci, 10.2:1, .625 roller cam, 2.19 intake on 049 oval port heads
with bowl blending work only, RPM Air-Gap manifold, 750 Vacc secondary
carb (too small), stock cooling system, stock crank, good rods/pistons,
K&N air filter, MSD ignition, Hooker comp headers, 2.5" exhaust (too
small).  Desktop Dyno 2000 software says 550 hp/550 ft/lb, but I'm
figuring on 500/500.

Trans is a TKO 5sp with .68 OD, 4.33 rear gears with 31" tires (equates
to about a 3.73 with 26.5" tires).  Runs on 93 octane fuel (Amoco's
best).

The 17.5mph was a special test drive, averaging 60mph (1900 rpm) for
just under 60 miles.   I drove very easy, maintained an even speed, no
traffic or slow downs.  That's useful for determining the ROI on an OD
trans, and a best case scenario MPG.

Now, when I'm getting on it, my calculations switch to a gallons/per
mile equation.  :-)





Quoting Clint Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> I'm sure one of the reasons Michael posted those numbers is to
> illustrate
> the effectiveness of a good overdrive tranny. Those are very
> impressive
> numbers for that car in its present configuration.
> My 69 El Camino's mileage went from 16mpg to around 22mpg on the
> highway,after I swapped in the 6spd. But,its 350sb is very
> mild-mannered.
> I'm hoping for at least 15-17mpg with the new 427bb.
> Clint Hooper
> H&H Custom,owner
> LT5 Registry Director
> http://www.LT5Registry.net/
> ACES #1650
> http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint_hooper.htm
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > 17.5 is great.  What rear gears you pulling?
> >
> > I don't have a BB but I have a pretty beefy SB w/a 4speed and 3.73
> posi.
> I get 6-8-10 depending on you know what!  The car is a driver.  I
> drove up
> in driving storm all the way and coming home from a 2 day show in
> June after
> being rained on all weekend, I was so happy to be going home I just
> cruised
> all the way.  Probably didn't open the 4barrel more than twice over
> the
> weekend.  Total mileage was about 200 and included 140 highway and
> the rest
> suburban.  Very little stop & start til close to home.  I filled up
> on the
> way up and back and kept mileage records.  I got over 15mpg.  It can
> be
> done.  But it's not much fun driving like that!!
> >
> > Phil G. 65 SS MCC#36  ACES#555  TC#1766  LGC  VCCA  AMCA
>
>
>





Reply via email to