Mikey,

Can you give me an url for the Wolfe products?

Thanks,

Fred
On Apr 2, 2004, at 9:57 AM, Capt Crunch wrote:

<x-tad-bigger>I just got a set of hotchkis upper, lowers, and reinforcing/connecting pieces. Not real impressed with them at all,�considering how great people hype them up to be, but the price was definetly right as Igot them with little use on em. I will be switching to Wolfe stuff when I can and selling these.</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>�</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>The BMR arms look good. Nothing super fancy, ut the price is right IMO... I also have no beef looking at the edelbrock ones and infact they look very nice. The spehirical bushing is a nice touch as well that I really like, but hard to say without seeing them in person.</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>�</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>Mikey</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>�</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>----- Original Message -----</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>From:</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> Fred Dowaliby</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>Sent:</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> Friday, April 02, 2004 6:45 AM</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>To:</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> The Chevelle Mailing List</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>Subject:</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> [Chevelle-list] rear control arms</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>�</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>I just bought a set of lower rear control arms from Global West, the </x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>ones with the spherical bearing and Del-a-lum bushings.</x-tad-bigger>

<x-tad-bigger>I am now considering those offered by Edelbrock as a cost cutting </x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>alternative for the uppers. They are about $90(Jeg's)� less than GW and </x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>also use a spherical bearing on the frame side, although poly on the </x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>axle side.</x-tad-bigger>

<x-tad-bigger>I would appreciate any advice/opinions on this, particularly from </x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>anyone who has purchased those from Global. This is for a cruiser, so </x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>out and out performance is not the issue, but I still want to do it </x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>right.</x-tad-bigger>

<x-tad-bigger>Thanks,</x-tad-bigger>

<x-tad-bigger>Fred</x-tad-bigger>


Reply via email to