i say confiscate the car and make him drive a rusted out f*rd pinto
Bill Bradley
67 Malibu (not done, but has lots of my blood and sweat in it)
Edmond Oklahoma
"D.R. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"D.R. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While I got the computer fired up need some help to see if I am wrong
about something or what?
Reading one of my car mags other day and read article on a car that was
a very nice car, really looked good. Reading the article the owner went
on and on about building the car themselves and "built it the way I
wanted it with no help from anyone". Ok, now after reading the complete
article all the owner actually did was write the checks to whoever did
the work. All the owner really did was select the places to have it
worked on. Now the owner did pick out the color scheme and which
motor/trans to go in the car, but at no time turned any wrenches etc..
I think this owner should say they paid someone and had it built to
their specs and not claim they built it.
I have no problem if someone can pay to have one built if that is the
way to have a car. Not everyone can actually build their car. I have
to have my paint and body work done as this is something I am not good
at nor do I like to do paint and body work. Whether my personal cars or
a customers car I don't do paint and body. Nor will I take credit for
the paint and body on a car.
So should I just ignore this peeve or still get snarly at those folks?
D.R. Jones
