GL on your up coming " in person lunch interview" next week.....

Wayne
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Studly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'The Chevelle Mailing List'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 4:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] "Re: Contents of Chevelle-list digest..."



I agree. It would be the real finishing touch for mine. I was unemployed
when I was putting my car back together with new engine and suspension back
in 2001 and the funds just haven't permitted it since. (I deemed EFI a
better way to spend my available money for the moment)


However, I have a job interview coming up next week Tuesday! If all goes
through, I should have a bunch more disposable income. I just got the call
for an in-person lunch interview (after doing 3 phone interviews with them),
so I'm kinda on cloud-9 at the moment! I have a pretty good feeling about
this..


-Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 4:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] "Re: Contents of Chevelle-list digest..."

The only thing iwould like to add one more thing to your wish list.. A a
Fast ratio, high feed back Steering box.. IMO the 2nd best thing to do to an


A body in the suspension department.

Wayne

----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Studly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'The Chevelle Mailing List'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 10:52 AM
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] "Re: Contents of Chevelle-list digest..."



Dan,

I have a mostly Hotchkis setup in my small-block '70 and am very happy.

Front: Hotchkis upper A-arms, stock lower A-arms, 77-96 B-body spindle
(allows 12" disc brakes) Hotchkis springs, poly bushings, 1.25" sway bar
from 70-81 F-body.  Parts store shocks.

Rear: Stock control arms with poly bushings, Hotchkis springs, no sway
bar.
Parts store shocks.

The handling improvement over stock is unbelievable.  When I did the
conversion, I had a stock '72 El Camino (with admittedly worn suspension
components) to compare against and the difference was *huge*.  If you
drove
the two cars back to back, you wouldn't think they were based on the same
chassis.  Freeway on/off ramps can be taken very aggressively if desired.

The Hotchkis springs lower the car, but not so much that you can't get a
jack under the front crossmember or anything extreme like that.  The
lowering is visually noticeable if parked next to a stocker.  It's not so
low that it is ricer-looking, though.

I race my car regularly at the drag strip. With Mickey Thompson ET
Streets,
I have no issues launching. My car pulls 1.8x 60-foot times with no wheel
hop. Just hooks and goes. With street tires, it'll just burn the
tires --
but no wheel hop.


Whichever manufacturer you choose, I think you'll be pretty pleased with
the
results.  The improved braking with the 12" discs makes the
Hotchkis/Global
West stuff worth it on its own.

Downsides: only a couple. Here in northern Ohio where we have lousy
pot-holed roads, the stiffer suspension can get a little annoying on rough
roads. Mine's not a daily driver, so I can tolerate it. The other is
that
with the tall spindles, something is different in the front-end geometry
that increases the turning radius. You'll only notice when you're trying
to
make a tight turn into a parking spot. It's enough to notice, but nothing

I
would describe as a 'problem.'

Anytime this topic comes up, I go into detail about it because I think
it's
the single-best upgrade someone can do to their Chevelle.  I had my car
for
11 years before I did it and wish I had done it sooner.  The results are
soooo worth the effort, IMO.  :-)

-Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Herb Lumpp
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 5:11 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] "Re: Contents of Chevelle-list digest..."

Hi Dan,

My El Camino rides on a complete Global West suspension along with
adjustable QA-1 shocks and custom made coils from Coil Spring Specialties.
It wasn't cheap but the ride and handling is (IMO) second to none. In
fact,
I would put money on it that the Elky handles better than my Vette, which
is
equipped with Vette Brakes & Products suspension components. On top of
the
cornering ability, with the adjustable shocks I can set it to launch hard
at
the drag strip.


http://www.globalwest.net/

http://coilsprings.com/

http://www.halshocks.com/


Herb Lumpp http://users.adelphia.net/~hlump/index.htm



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Mascheck
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 4:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Chevelle-list] "Re: Contents of Chevelle-list digest..."


I would like to replace my front and rear suspension to either a Heidt,
Hotchkis, Global West or a combination of the above or whatever seems to
be
the best. I do more cruising than strip application, but would not rule
out
taking on the strip! I have a 72 Chevelle with a bored .060 454 with a BDS
8-71 supercharger.


What advantage do you get by using a lowered spindle other than looks? I'm
not too much into the newer squat look, I see in cars designed by Foose or
Coddington. I'm not against it...It's just not for me!


Any help would be appreciated. I'm in the research phase.

 Dan Mascheck
 Wharton, TX

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 1:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Chevelle-list Digest, Vol 19, Issue 33

Send Chevelle-list mailing list submissions to
[email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://chevelles.net/mailman/listinfo/chevelle-list_chevelles.net
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Chevelle-list digest..."














Reply via email to