Hi JJ: Crawl underneath & check out a weekend driver. Few if any can compete with a true trailer queen. These cars are restored to 995-1000 point stature & never put on the road again. These guys must have barometers stuck up themselves. I've seen them trailer up just seconds B4 the rain comes. Years of just driving to shows, 1000-1500 miles a season does cause deterioration from normal wear, etc. All the cleaning & painting in the world will not prevent it from showing. Queens remain pristine forever! While the weekend show car may look super clean up top and really sharp to an observer, to a judge it's no contest. Not even close in the case of a real driver. Again, crawl underneath. This is the true difference & real concern of drivers vs queens!! It's apples & oranges.
We're not talking about rustbucket DD's cause there are some nice restored DD's out there but a true restored DD competing against a weekend restored driver is in the same situation as the restored weekender against a true trailor queen. When you start crawling & judging it is no contest. Yes it's true that some guys trailer for convenience & necessity because of distance to shows & performance gearing, etc. However many of these cars are driven locally and it shows, and even raced. The true queens once complete only come on & off the trailer. Just doesn't seem right that they compete in the same class when they're not! I don't have the answer either. The inequity exists & we all know it. Once again I've said enough. My appologies if I offend anyone. None offense intended.
P.S. I kinda think it's neat when guys put those mirrors up under their cars.
Phil G. 65 SS
-----Original Message-----
From: John Fig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: The Chevelle Mailing List <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 04:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Trailered vs. Non-Trailered Cars at shows
Maybe just to clear up a few things...
We aren't talking daily drivers versus trailer queens. At our show we have a daily driver class for cars that are a person's main mode of transportation. Its an issue of putting a restored car that is driven against one that is trailered.
As an interesting observation at many of the shows I have been to I have seen just as many(if not more) modified trailer queens as I have numbers matching restos.
Personally I don't think there is an easy answer for this. Trailers are needed for one of two things: convenience or necessity.
JMHO
JJ Fig
Clint Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Clint Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bob,your opinion pretty much mirrors mine. I really don't pay much attention to numbers-matching trailer queens.Don't think it's fair for daily drivers to compete with them,either.Clint Hooper
H&H Custom,owner
1969 El Camino ProTourer
2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm----- Original Message -----From: Bob GDonnie:
Trailer queens just do not interest me in the least....Can't remember when I last even
checked one out.... Give them a separate class and keep them parked together..
Just my opinion..
Bob Griffiths
- RE: [Chevelle-list] Trailered vs. Non-Tra... Herb Lumpp
- Re: [Chevelle-list] Trailered vs. No... Jason Fiegel
- RE: [Chevelle-list] Trailered vs. No... Wayne Kline
- Re: [Chevelle-list] Trailered vs. No... plgchevelle65
- Re: [Chevelle-list] Trailered vs... John Fig
- Re: [Chevelle-list] Trailere... TC
- RE: [Chevelle-list] Trai... Chuck Speake
- RE: [Chevelle-list] Trai... Chuck Speake
- Re: [Chevelle-list] Trailere... plgchevelle65
- [Chevelle-list] 68 Malib... KW
- Re: [Chevelle-list]... Rick Schaefer
- Re: [Chevelle-l... Gene's General Restoration Parts
- Re: [Chevelle-list] Trai... Clint Hooper
- Re: [Chevelle-list] Trailered vs. No... SHOVEL6793

