I'm pretty sure that it would apply up to 1972,,maybe later. Clint Hooper H&H Custom,owner 1969 El Camino ProTourer 2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm ----- Original Message ----- From: "jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> can you tell me if that applies to the 1972 cars as well ? thanks , Jimmy.C > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >I didn't track all the emails in this chain, but the motor mounts for a BB > >vs. SB in a '65 are identical in every shape and form. The frame mounts > >are the exact same height also, but the BB version have a small relief for > >clearance I suppose, but are completely unnecessary on my 502. I don't > >know if any other BB's needed this clearance, but I doubt it. So I say > >stick with the SB stuff. Its all the same. > > > > Charles > > www.65ss.com > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Clint Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "The Chevelle Mailing List" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 5:41 PM > > Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Re: Parts > > > > > >> If you run headers,they will hang a little bit lower. > >> Clint Hooper > >> H&H Custom,owner > >> 1969 El Camino ProTourer > >> 2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger > >> http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Ryan Langstraat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> > >>> Clint > >>> would setting the engine lower vs. higher make any foreseeable clearance > >>> problems? > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
