Sounds good. I'll take a look at my cam card tonight and post specs.
Thanks again. At 03:45 PM 12/19/2005, Clint Hooper wrote:
Post your cam's timing/overlap specs. We can get a general idea from that. Clint Hooper H&H Custom,owner 1969 El Camino ProTourer 2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Post" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'll have to look at my dyno info to see if they captured vacuum. If not, > is there a way to guess roughly by cam specs? Just thinking I would want > to install the booster before the engine is running. I already picked up a > new "mini" booster to clear my valve covers, but I have heard those don't > perform as well as the factory sized ones. Hindsight, I'm thinking a > hydroboost might have been the better choice. > > Thanks for the help. > > -Matt > > At 02:56 PM 12/19/2005, you wrote: > >Anything below 12" of vacuum is probably starting to get a little shaky. > >Clint Hooper > >H&H Custom,owner > >1969 El Camino ProTourer > >2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger > >http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Matthew Post" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > When is a cam big enough to benefit from hydroboost? Or I guess another > > > way to ask this is when is manifold vacuum too low to operate a power > >brake > > > booster? Just curious. > > > > > > -Matt > > > > > > At 12:30 PM 12/19/2005, Mike Holleman wrote: > > > >Thanks Ed, The hydroboost works unreal. Check em out at > >www.hydroboost.com. > > > >Mike > > > >
