I would suggest that there is still a place for records -- ``Records still have their use case as is right now. Maps have more in common semantically with dicts than they have with records, where the similarity is syntactical. I prefer to prioritize semantics over syntax.''
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7162113 I agree with him. On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 6:21:32 AM UTC-8, jim rosenblum wrote: > > Two thoughts about this: > 1) Since Erlang is moving towards maps and away from records, would it be > insane to suggest waiting until that transition is in place and migrating > CB to maps and away from records? > 2) I understand that the parse_transforms are "Magic" and problematic, but > from a *user* perspective, what CB offers now in terms of models is simple > and (to me) elegant and I enjoy *not* having to interact with behaviors and > the additional boiler-plate that I suspect would result. > > my .02 > > >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ChicagoBoss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chicagoboss. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chicagoboss/0d2c8a1d-960f-49ac-928f-8a4beaf7567b%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
