> This has not happened yet, though I do agree completely with Zach's > initiative. I'm tackling boss_db stuff right now, and wrapping my head > around it before I go in and start changing fundamentals - for now, > I'm just getting tests to work properly. Once the higher-level tests > are working properly, I can start looking into exposing the magic of > boss_db.
One thing that I think we ought to consider going forward: if it's possible to do something that's nice and concise like boss_db without all the compiler magic. It really makes all of us dependent on the very few who have dived in and figured out how things work. -- David N. Welton http://www.welton.it/davidw/ http://www.dedasys.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ChicagoBoss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chicagoboss. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chicagoboss/CA%2Bb9R_shk%2Bua_wk-wzGc_49qQmq5HyxKLSa1yAqkbbmjNi963Q%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
