BRILLIANT !

Thanks Jesse - much appreciated - and from where I am standing it is a
superb solution  ;-)

On a totally unrelated topic . . .

I have noticed a 57,000 times speedup in the performance of DEV mode. Well,
I may be exaggerating a little, but some time ago I moved to an i7 machine
precisely because performance on my i5 became unbearably slow as my
application grew. It was clear the whole thing was being recompiled every
time I hit enter.  I was getting 40-50 second responses.

Moving to the i7 brought that down to about 10 seconds, which was still
painful, but on the plus side gave me a LOT of thinking time.  ;-)

Now with CB 0.8.12 (and Erlang 17) I am getting sub-second response times,
as you would expect. It's really too short to estimate by eye.

Did something change? (Sorry - dumb question. I meant WHAT changed?)


Anyway, thanks again

g






On 30 June 2014 12:37, Jesse Gumm <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Graeme,
>
> I realize this is just as helpful as my last recommendation, but what
> if you tried adding
>
> -compile({no_auto_import, [round/1]). to the top of your module?  It's
> not exactly a great fix, but it might work.
>
> I'm curious if that would fix it.
>
> -Jesse
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Graeme Defty <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > . . . and finally (perhaps ;-) )
> >
> > I am getting the error message:
> >
> >     [{0,erl_lint,{call_to_redefined_old_bif,{round,1}}}]
> >
> > This comes from a generated function because I have a model called
> 'round',
> > and the model causing the error "-belongs_to(round)".
> >
> > Again, this is a change in behaviour - all was well before.
> >
> > This may well be a change in Erlang behaviour, but I raise it here in
> case
> > someone can either confirm that and/or point me to a place where there
> is a
> > parameter which allows BIF redefinition.
> >
> > (I also realise that I can stop using the word 'round' . . . but in a
> > golfing application? Which is almost 17,000 lines of erlang???  I am not
> > keen for that to be the answer - LoL )
> >
> > Thanks again for any help.
> >
> > g
> >
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "ChicagoBoss" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to [email protected].
> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chicagoboss.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> >
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chicagoboss/CAKF5fiCPJH8BoMMOi8rm_DJYFBG1wDu7TKi7-%3DxAo9AC9DLXrA%40mail.gmail.com
> .
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
> --
> Jesse Gumm
> Owner, Sigma Star Systems
> 414.940.4866 || sigma-star.com || @jessegumm
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ChicagoBoss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chicagoboss.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chicagoboss/CAPTXyXf6vZbhGKkrM4OUESDb8F6wpF52P3mEFuUiuKnAHyf7GQ%40mail.gmail.com
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ChicagoBoss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chicagoboss.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chicagoboss/CAKF5fiAWp42EigUY58hO2Sv%3DvToc0K-QTH9BJT%3DcXNqx-91uGw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to