From: Moritz Heidkamp <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Suggestion for the ports unit: port-pipe Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 05:52:34 +0200
> Felix <[email protected]> writes: >> I'd call it `port-copy'. > > I thought of that, too, but it sounds like it would copy the port > objects rather than stream their contents. Maybe `port-stream'? I'm not > sure :-) What do you think about its usefulness? I might as well just > make an egg for it if you think it's too specific to be included in the > core distribution. Hm. Perhaps `port-copy-contents' or `port-copy-data'? It's trivial enough to be added to `ports', I guess. On the other hand there already is enough stuff in the core libs. I can't say. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
